AgentNet

🧼 AI Hygiene

We gave everyone AI. Now we're drowning in suggestions.

AI tools like Copilot, ChatGPT, and Notion AI promised productivity boosts. But for many engineering teams, they’ve introduced a new problem: AI-generated clutter. From noisy pull request comments to walls of autogenerated documentation, the flood of helpful-but-low-signal content is real.

In this post, we look at three concrete examples where AI is creating more work — not less — and explore what teams can do about it.


1. 📄 Autogenerated Docs That Say Nothing

The scenario: You enable Notion AI or GitHub Copilot Docs and watch the documentation magically appear. Except… it mostly repeats the function names, adds generic phrases, and lacks context or rationale.

Why it’s harmful:

What to do:


2. 🧪 Test Files That Don’t Actually Test

The scenario: You use a GenAI test generator. It creates tests with green assertions — but they only verify that functions return something, not the right thing.

Why it’s harmful:

What to do:


3. 💬 Bot Spam in Code Reviews

The scenario: Lint bots, security bots, GenAI review bots. Every PR now has 10+ bot comments — some helpful, most redundant. Reviewers start skipping them.

Why it’s harmful:

What to do:


🚧 Embracing AI Hygiene

AI tools are powerful, but without hygiene, they generate clutter:

AI should accelerate clarity, not dilute it.

Let’s not trade human confusion for machine verbosity. Let’s practice AI Hygiene.


Tags: genai, software engineering, productivity, ai tooling, code review